takings$516860$ - translation to greek
Diclib.com
ChatGPT AI Dictionary
Enter a word or phrase in any language 👆
Language:

Translation and analysis of words by ChatGPT artificial intelligence

On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:

  • how the word is used
  • frequency of use
  • it is used more often in oral or written speech
  • word translation options
  • usage examples (several phrases with translation)
  • etymology

takings$516860$ - translation to greek

Regulatory takings; Nollan/Dolan; Regulatory taking; Regulatory takings in the United Sates

takings      
n. εισπράξεις
compulsory purchase         
  • Espropria}}, "expropriate", protest graffiti in [[Turin]]
POWER OF A STATE OR A NATIONAL GOVERNMENT TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC USE
Compulsory purchase; Expropriated; Expropriating; Takings; Takings law; Unjust taking; Right of eminent domain; Compulsory acquisition; Compulsory Purchase; Imminent Domain; Condemnation action; Emminent domain; Right Of Eminent Domain; Right of Eminent Domain; Complusary purchase; Expropriations; Expropriates; Expropriative; Expropriator; Expropriators; Expropriational; Expropriationally; Land acquisition laws; Compulsorily purchase; Eminent-domain; Power of eminent domain; Land acquisition by government; Land expropriation; Condemned structure; Condemned lot; Land resumption
απαλλοτρίωση

Definition

takings
the amount of money earned by a business from the sale of goods or services.

Wikipedia

Regulatory takings in the United States

In United States constitutional law, a regulatory taking occurs when governmental regulations limit the use of private property to such a degree that the landowner is effectively deprived of all economically reasonable use or value of their property. Under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution governments are required to pay just compensation for such takings. The amendment is incorporated to the states via the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Regulatory takings jurisprudence has its roots in Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes' opinion in Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon (1922) which stated that: "The general rule, at least, is that, if regulation goes too far, it will be recognized as a taking for which compensation must be paid."

Modern jurisprudence to determine whether a regulatory taking has occurred centers around the ad hoc factor-based test that the Supreme Court of the United States laid out in Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City (1978). Courts are to consider the economic impact of the governmental regulation, the extent to which the regulation interferes with investment-backed expectations, and the character of the governmental action. It is characterized as a disorganized test.